Posts
Love Shack closes in Johns Creek, but suits continue
17 years ago
Showing posts with label johns creek. Show all posts
Showing posts with label johns creek. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Love Shack Submits Ante Litem Notice for $668,000 to City of Johns Creek
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Sexually Oriented Business Held in Contempt of Court
A Georgia judge ruled last week that the sexually oriented Love Shack is in contempt for continuing to operate after a permanent injunction was issued against it.
Judge Ural Glanville issued a $500 fine to the Johns Creek business for criminal contempt and ordered a $3,000-per-day fine if the business remains open. Owner John Cornetta could face jail time.
Glanville ordered the injunction because the Love Shack is violating city ordinances by operating in an area not zoned for sexually oriented businesses.
“The message in this story is that it pays to be prepared,” said Pat Trueman, special counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. “The city, not the strip club, is in the driver’s seat because it had the foresight to pass a sexually oriented business ordinance.”
Judge Ural Glanville issued a $500 fine to the Johns Creek business for criminal contempt and ordered a $3,000-per-day fine if the business remains open. Owner John Cornetta could face jail time.
Glanville ordered the injunction because the Love Shack is violating city ordinances by operating in an area not zoned for sexually oriented businesses.
“The message in this story is that it pays to be prepared,” said Pat Trueman, special counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. “The city, not the strip club, is in the driver’s seat because it had the foresight to pass a sexually oriented business ordinance.”
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Johns Creek v. Love Shack: Appeals Expected
CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO THE BROADCAST
ATLANTA, GA (2008-03-11) The battle between the city of Johns Creek and the Love Shack continues. Yesterday a judge reaffirmed his prior ruling that the store is operating illegally, and should be fined $3000 dollars a day if it stays open.
In the prior ruling, the store was told to change its merchandise so as not to qualify as an adult-business, move to a zone where adult businesses are allowed, or to close. Mayor Michael Bodker says as recently as March 9th, the store was open, and code inspectors found it was still sexually-oriented:
BODKER: We're not trying to ban the business, we are simply asking that the business either operate truly as a non-adult business or move to a location where it can operate as one.
But Cary Wiggins, lawyer for Love Shack's owner, says the store has made changes to avoid the adult-business designation.
WIGGINS: Long story short, the store is reducing its merchandise that could be characterized as sexually-explicit.
Wiggins plans to appeal the court's ruling.
ATLANTA, GA (2008-03-11) The battle between the city of Johns Creek and the Love Shack continues. Yesterday a judge reaffirmed his prior ruling that the store is operating illegally, and should be fined $3000 dollars a day if it stays open.
In the prior ruling, the store was told to change its merchandise so as not to qualify as an adult-business, move to a zone where adult businesses are allowed, or to close. Mayor Michael Bodker says as recently as March 9th, the store was open, and code inspectors found it was still sexually-oriented:
BODKER: We're not trying to ban the business, we are simply asking that the business either operate truly as a non-adult business or move to a location where it can operate as one.
But Cary Wiggins, lawyer for Love Shack's owner, says the store has made changes to avoid the adult-business designation.
WIGGINS: Long story short, the store is reducing its merchandise that could be characterized as sexually-explicit.
Wiggins plans to appeal the court's ruling.
Monday, March 10, 2008
Love Shack owner charged with contempt
John Cornetta was fined $500, given stern warning
By DOUG NURSE
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 03/10/08
The owner of the Love Shack has been found in contempt of court for continuing to operate the sexually oriented business in the city of Johns Creek.
Owner John Cornetta was fined $500 and issued a stern warning by the judge: If the Love Shack continues to violate city rules on the sale of adult merchandise, Cornetta could go to jail, the store could be closed and a $3,000-a-day fine could be issued
"There has been a pattern and practice of not complying with this court and other bodies," Fulton County Superior Court Judge Ural Glanville said. "If I tell them not to do it and fine them, and they still do it, then we go to the next step."
The store remained open Monday.
The ruling came Monday afternoon, after city officials claimed Cornetta was violating a court order issued Feb. 28 by Glanville. The judge's earlier written order said Cornetta couldn't operate a sexually oriented business at its Johns Creek location at Jones Bridge and State Bridge roads.
Cornetta was out of the country on vacation and couldn't be reached for comment Monday.
Cary Wiggins, Cornetta's attorney said that the store would try to comply, but said that pending litigation over the same store, filed in federal court in Fulton County, could reshape the whole case.
"We're certainly happy the court recognized what we've been saying for a long time that the Love Shack is an adult business," said Mayor Mike Bodker. "It is yet another victory in a long process." The city has been trying to close the business for about a year.
City officials have argued the site of the Love Shack is not zoned for adult businesses, and that Cornetta needed to move, change his inventory, or close.
Friday, March 7, 2008
Johns Creek wants contempt citation against Love ShackAtlanta Business Chronicle
Johns Creek, Ga., filed a motion in Fulton County Superior Court on March 7 seeking a contempt citation against a sex toy and adult video store, claiming the business is operating in violation of city ordinances.
The city said Love Shack at 10590 State Bridge Rd. was slapped with a permanent injunction in February that said the store could not do business in violation of city codes, without a business license or run a sexually oriented business in parts of the city not zoned for that use. After the injunction, city code enforcement officers visited Love Shack several times and reported the store continues to meet the city's definition of a sexually oriented business due to the percentage of its products that are adult in nature.
"Today we have presented our findings to the judge for his review," said Mike Bodker, Johns Creek mayor. "If he agrees with our assessment, then we are asking that he take whatever action he deems appropriate."
The city denied Love Shack a business license in 2007. The owner reapplied for a 2008 license on Feb. 26, but the city has not yet acted on the recent application.
The city said Love Shack at 10590 State Bridge Rd. was slapped with a permanent injunction in February that said the store could not do business in violation of city codes, without a business license or run a sexually oriented business in parts of the city not zoned for that use. After the injunction, city code enforcement officers visited Love Shack several times and reported the store continues to meet the city's definition of a sexually oriented business due to the percentage of its products that are adult in nature.
"Today we have presented our findings to the judge for his review," said Mike Bodker, Johns Creek mayor. "If he agrees with our assessment, then we are asking that he take whatever action he deems appropriate."
The city denied Love Shack a business license in 2007. The owner reapplied for a 2008 license on Feb. 26, but the city has not yet acted on the recent application.
Monday, March 3, 2008
Nothing to love about The Love Shack
By Jim Osterman | Monday, March 3, 2008, 08:51 AM
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Sex had a good run last week - as a topic in the news, I mean.
A church in a Florida publicly encouraged its married members to engage on conjugal gymnastics every day for a month. It had something to do with celebrating the joys of matrimonial life — and I’m guessing a few couples may have bolted for home before the offering plate was passed.
Closer to home, one of our sister cities to the north won a round in an ongoing legal battle to chase The Love Shack, purveyor of so-called adult merchandise, out of town. I smell an appeal in the air and once again wish I’d gone to law school because the lawyers are the true winners in these things. But back to sex.
By my count we have one strip club and two adult bookstores in the confines of our little burg, and this mightily offends many of our citizens. I’m offended as well, but for a different reason than most.
It offends me that there is enough local trade for these places to be profitable enough to remain open. Want to usher businesses like this out of Sandy Springs? Don’t dump it in the city council’s lap and hope they can concoct some law. Don’t picket or circulate petitions. Don’t form a coalition of concerned clergy and feminist groups. The solution is much easier.
Starve the rascals to death.
We may be loath to admit this, if there weren’t enough of us slapping down our dollars in these stores and clubs they wouldn’t exist. And, yes, I understand that not everyone patronizing these places is a Sandy Springsteen, but guess what? They aren’t staying open because people are coming from all over the metro area to get their thrills in our city.
In case you haven’t noticed, Sandy Springs is not the only place in metro Atlanta where you can buy sexually explicit videos or watch ladies dancing naked. So if these places are showing a profit the bulk of it is coming from the locals.
And until we shut off the faucet these places will be alive and well on Roswell Road. Maybe if we learned to respect each other, and have a little more reverence for sex, it would be a good start. Maybe then these places would lose their allure.
Perhaps that Florida pastor has it right — we’d be better served if sex was taken out of the retail/entertainment arena and put it into church. I’m not sure it necessarily belongs there, but it would be a big step up from where
Permalink | Comments (67) | Post your comment | Categories: Jim Osterman
Comments
By Tom
March 3, 2008 12:16 PM | Link to this
In short…..
The complainers aren’t buying, and the buyers aren’t complaining.
If you want to drive a store selling legal adult merchandise out of business, do it the American way….
Open a competitor with better selection and prices. Duh.
*
By C
March 3, 2008 1:22 PM | Link to this
There are 3 strip clubs, and three adult bookstores in Sandy Springs. Know your town and know your porn before writing.
By TNG
March 4, 2008 11:21 AM | Link to this
So there are these people who buy stuff there but hate the place? That’s a brilliant deduction - you’re a freakin’ genius Jim. HAHAHA!
By Harold
March 4, 2008 11:21 AM | Link to this
Sound like somebody need some more action in they own bedroom so they stop worryin about the bedrooms of others! Mine your own business, dummy!
By Katie
March 4, 2008 11:33 AM | Link to this
Oh my god, sex is bad!! please, everyone does it. If you don’t like the love shack, don’t shop there—it really is THAT simple. All you bible thumping morons need to get over yourself.
By robo
March 4, 2008 11:38 AM | Link to this
What’s new? Sex sells. Always has and always will.
By Troy
March 4, 2008 11:39 AM | Link to this
The patrons are all of us from Cobb coming across the river to Sandy Spings!
By No Dawgs Here
March 4, 2008 11:41 AM | Link to this
OK. I got an idea. Those that oppose China, go and protest outside all the Wal-Marts.(IE; China’s #1 customer) Those that don’t believe in god, go and hold up “God is a lie” banners outside all the churches. Some people really just need to get a life. Geez… Protest this protest that. It’s a business. Not anything else. If you don’t like it, go somewhere else. I don’t like to eat at Sonny’s BBQ, does that mean I can hold up signs and try to close them down? I agree some radical “Bible thumpers” need to do less judging and let he that can only judge do the judging.
By Patrick
March 4, 2008 11:43 AM | Link to this
You forgot about Mardi Gras Gentleman’s club in Powers Ferry Landing. It’s well hidden behind some trees on a hill, but it’s in Sandy Springs as well.
By Keon
March 4, 2008 11:54 AM | Link to this
It’s ridiculous…
If they are not violating the law then I don’t see a problem. I’m sure there can be some sort of compromise. I can understand not wanting a place like this in view of children. I recall that was a problem before if I recall. Cover the windows, have the entrance facing the back etc… Tax revenue is tax revenue!
To my understanding you can’t have a business of this nature near a house of worship or a place where children congregate(school, daycare etc..) You also can’t have vulgar displays in the window. If these things are being done then what’s the problem?
I wish I could have one in my neighborhood…actually I prefer Southern Nights and Insurrections!:)
These store fulfill a need/want and attempting to say they don’t is ridiculous!
By bameroni
March 4, 2008 12:02 PM | Link to this
I’m sorry; at least these places pay taxes that support “your” community and the local church and church-related organizations do not.
By Ryan Tucker
March 4, 2008 12:03 PM | Link to this
Sandy Springs happens to be in America. And in America we get to shop where we want. We also get to protest where we want. I don’t care if the bible-thumping idiots want to protest, I just hope they realize it’s a waste of time.
By Now ain't that sumthin'
March 4, 2008 12:07 PM | Link to this
All of this talk of the Love Shack is making me horny!
By Now ain't that sumthin'
March 4, 2008 12:07 PM | Link to this
All of this talk of the Love Shack is making me horny!
By Lost
March 4, 2008 12:15 PM | Link to this
Can some one give me directions to the Love Shack. My pastor is fresh out of lube.
By JPW
March 4, 2008 12:20 PM | Link to this
Oh my god!! What a people choose to buy to use in there own house is no concern of anyone else. If people want to buy videos, toys, joke gifts, and so on who cares.
People act as if a woman buying a vibrater is buying an M-16. Change your mindset! One kills people the other brings pleasure. Oh God she has a dildo!!! Oh God he purchased a blow-up doll and DVD’s!! Run for the hills. Get over yourselves. If a couple wants to walk into a store and buy whips, chain, and all the other interesting things that they can so be it. Are they affecting you? No!
People protest based on moral decay! Here look in the mirror you are the cause of it as much as anyone. Deal with it; this is the world we built not just me. The protesters say they sell to minors, again wrong. The Bars, Clubs, and the Stores all card and if you are 18 you are asked to leave. I have been there and been carded. Face facts most people that are protesting the Love Shack, The Pink Ponie, and all the others have never been into one. You want moral decay look at how you are raising your children to look down at others.
The sex industry whether it is prostitution or a store like the love shack is doing the world a favor, and taking a risk to do so. Rapes have gone DOWN in Las Vegas since they have legalized it. What does that say? What about the people that for whatever reason are not attractive to other people or do not have the social skills to entertain people why should they not have a place to help them create their fansty and make them feel good about themselves?
The people who waste their time protesting these businesses are just sad. If they would put as much effort in to their own families, their schools, and simply their own lives maybe just maybe some of the issues that do effect them like violence, kids shooting each other, drugs, and other issues would go down.
The short of it is this places are not doing anything harmful, people may not like them but no one is holding a gun to anyone head to go into them. People may not like the why they look in a shopping plaza, by a church, or by some other institution, and that is their opinion and opinions do not make laws. In some cases these businesses were there first before a church or a strip mall, in which cases people knew what they were building by.
In closing I just want to say that the human body is a wonderful thing a true work of art and these businesses are just celebrating this fact, why condemn them for it?
By Tertius
March 4, 2008 12:22 PM | Link to this
Good points. Sex is sinfully cheapened and degraded and perverted when it’s a commercial exploit. Churches should do more to address the proper role of sex: joyfully in the commitment of marriage. But even that message cannot be divorced from the Gospel which provides the fuller context for how people are to live before a holy God.
But yes, I stand with you that rather than moralistic legal action, churches and concerned citizens would do well to promote a positive, healthy, Christian view of joyful sex within marriage, and to with gentleness and grace address the life-destroying effects of sexual sins like pornography.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:33 PM | Link to this
I’ve got a solution to shut them down: have two people with running video cameras at all times the store is open. One filing the licence plates of the cars who come in, and go out, and one filing the patrons entering and leaving. That way, if someone is a registered sex offender and is patronizing the place, the evidence is there to send them back to jail. So really 2 problems are solved! Less sex offenders on the streets in SS, and less people who are closet sex offenders, which would entirely shut the place down!
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:33 PM | Link to this
I’ve got a solution to shut them down: have two people with running video cameras at all times the store is open. One filing the licence plates of the cars who come in, and go out, and one filming the patrons entering and leaving. That way, if someone is a registered sex offender and is patronizing the place, the evidence is there to send them back to jail. So really 2 problems are solved! Less sex offenders on the streets in SS, and less people who are closet sex offenders, which would entirely shut the place down!
By MW
March 4, 2008 12:33 PM | Link to this
bameroni,
Please give me a break! Please don’t compare this trash to the local church based on sales tax revenue. Poor argument, please try again.
By RevIke
March 4, 2008 12:35 PM | Link to this
Remember, You can have sex in Sandy Springs, Just don’t use gadgets or tell your neighbors.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:37 PM | Link to this
JPW,
Because exploitation of women is not healthy sex.
If we showed men being victimized and raped, you be against it for sure…
By harold
March 4, 2008 12:37 PM | Link to this
IF THE AJC DIDNT DRUM THIS UP, THERE WOULDNT BE NO PROTESTORS. AJC IS THE GUILTY PARTY.
By curiouser and curiouser
March 4, 2008 12:39 PM | Link to this
Jim, if the citizens of Sandy Springs want to patronize these establishments, who are you to say they can’t? The entire premise of a “free” country is exactly that: “freedom”. If the establishments weren’t welcome, they WOULD die out from lack of business. Except they aren’t dying out. That tells me you’re in the minority on this one, huh, and the Sandy Springs residents do welcome these establishments.
(BTW: The correct answer is “You aren’t ANYONE to say they can’t, and so you should STFU, GBTW, and quit trying to dictate others’ actions based on moral pronouncements from your personal sky fairy.”)
By Pat
March 4, 2008 12:40 PM | Link to this
Come on, let’s focus on something that really matters. Why is the American society so afraid of sex, when everyone does it, wants to do it, and wants to watch it. These places are in business zones and not across the street from a school. I don’t see any strippers in windows - like Amsterdam - so what’s the problem. We have no compassion in this country for the exact human desire that brought us here. And sex in church, within the sanctity of marriage, who cares.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:47 PM | Link to this
Pat, My parents were married, not engaging in orgies, with mutilations, whips, chains and the like.
Last time I checked, I am still an American and I have a right to protest anything I like (at least until the one of the two Christian-hating Communists get elected this Fall!)…
By Steve
March 4, 2008 12:51 PM | Link to this
Only in this backwards hick state would we even be having this discussion.
Last time I checked:
a: this is a free country b: children aren’t allowed in the stores c: sex is not bad, or evil, or naughty. Honestly. d: it brings in tax income e: sex toys spice up boring married and single sex lives f: videos keep folks from looking elsewhere for sex
Get a Grip and Join the 21st Century.
By gttim
March 4, 2008 12:52 PM | Link to this
Yeah, because there are not more important issues we should be concerned about. Sandy Springs incorporated because they were tired of Fulton County spending money in ways they did not approve of and making laws they did not like. So now Sandy Springs is going to spend money on things most of it citizens do not care about and make laws that most of its citizens do not want. Nice!
BTW, you can get much better prices over the internet, but by buying in person you get to make sure everything is the correct size.
Was it Dear Abby or Ann Landers who asked a minister if it was alright to have sex before church? The minister said it was fine as long as you did not block the isle. We need more people who do not take things so seriously.
By rt
March 4, 2008 12:53 PM | Link to this
What do you want to bet that some of those same bilble thumpers are back tonight as patrons. Remember, bible thumpers, CHOIR BOYS ALL TALK SOONER OR LATER. The lube is on the left when you go in.
By get a life
March 4, 2008 12:55 PM | Link to this
The bed of the married is undefiled. Me and my husband who are both Christans were just in the Love Shack 2 weeks ago! and the night ended wonderfully!! People need to mind there business about what others choose to do or incorporate in their bedrooms. At least we can tell who’s unhappy and who’s sex life is boring. If a couple chooses to watch porn together or whatever that is their decision and no one has a right to say what or what GROWN people should or should not be doing. As for the sex offenders, would you rather then get a porn movie or go prey on some kid again? I say get a porn get yourself off and leave the babies alone!
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:55 PM | Link to this
Steve, BS, Every sex offender has 2 things in his house (prove me wrong, and I’ll believe you): 1.Running Water 2.PORN
By Steve
March 4, 2008 12:56 PM | Link to this
Carol, My parents had a codependent alcoholic marriage, so what’s your point? Who cares what your or my parents did. This is the 21st century.
Evolve.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:56 PM | Link to this
Steve, BS, Every sex offender has 2 things in his house (prove me wrong, and I’ll believe you): 1.Running Water 2.PORN
By Conga
March 4, 2008 12:58 PM | Link to this
Just like the Sunday liquor debate, if you don’t like naked women gyrating in front of you then don’t visit a strip club. Just like if you don’t want to drink on Sunday then you don’t have to buy alcohol-but let us who want-should be able to on Sundays, don’t tell me what I can and can’t do just because you don’t agree with the majority!
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:00 PM | Link to this
Get a Life,
So the Ten Commandments are optional to others but not you and your husband? I don’t get it(??)
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:01 PM | Link to this
Get a Life,
So the Ten Commandments are optional to others but not you and your husband? I don’t get it(??)
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:03 PM | Link to this
Steve,
I don’t want to evolve back into an animal: that’s why they call us “civilized”. we can reason, we have self-control (??)…
By 1 more thing
March 4, 2008 1:05 PM | Link to this
look at some of these women in the line with the pickets. That will give you an idea of the type of woman that’s protesting this place.
Old - Angry - Fat -Hillary Clinton Supporters.
You don’t see any long legged - fantastic body - gorgeous - hot women protesting - do ya?
That’s the problem - these women gave up on sex - years ago. Would you wanna have sex with any of these women in the picture.
They let themselves go - and have no sex life! They are otta shape and disgusting.
Because their sex life stinks - they want to crawl in your bedroom window, and make sure your not having any fun either!
GET A LIFE HONEY!
GET A GYM MEMBERSHIP AND A MAKEOVER WHILE YOUR AT IT!
Victoria’s Secret does not come in XXXL
By Steve
March 4, 2008 1:07 PM | Link to this
Carol, guess what - I’m not a sex offender and I have porn and running water in my house. What is your point?
What is wrong with people in Georgia? It’s like you people don’t think.
By Concerned
March 4, 2008 1:08 PM | Link to this
Perhaps those of you who claim that the Love Shack is operating legally should do THEIR homework before saying the holy rollers should live and let live. Also they should learn of the dangerous “activities” that take place in the Love Shack locations. In reality, residents don’t want to draw sexual predators into their neighborhoods. I am not implying that all patrons are predators, but that places like this are a draw for them and fuels their fire for the perverted. I appreciate the article, but there will always be those who see no reason to resist this base type of entertainment. The best we can do is be sure they are operating legally. The Johns Creek location is still open even though they lost the court battle to remain open. I’m not sure what is up with law enforcement there, but Mr. Cornetta (Love Shack owner) has ZERO respect for the laws of the land.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:11 PM | Link to this
1 More Thing:
What do YOU look like?
I’m not fat…do you want me to be fat so you’re right? Most gorgeous women I know agree, but they are working. I’d be there myself, except I have to work as well. Those people have a right to protect their children, grandchildren, etc. from sex perverts.
By CommonSenseNotSoCommon
March 4, 2008 1:12 PM | Link to this
Those wonderful holy-ghost-filled-saved-&-sanctified folks in Sandy Springs aren’t buying novelty toys! They’re hitting their neigbors and paying for the real thing on Ponce-De-Leon, Metropolitan Ave (formerly Stewart Avenue), Ashby Street. They can also be found on cheating on their spouses having same sex affairs online and having rendez-vous at high end hotels. So they have no need for the novelty toys!
To all I say - Let’s go shopping in Sandy Springs! Hell - I am going to buy something for my wife today!!!
By jimmy k
March 4, 2008 1:14 PM | Link to this
These prudish fundys don’t have anything better to do than protest a legal business offering legal products to people who can choose of their own free will to enter the store or not. They are pathetic, miserable worms. Of course, when someone is convinced “God told me to do X” then no amount of logic or reason can disuade them. The protesters would be far more likely to initiate physical force against other people than the customers at Love Shack. Perhaps the FBI would do better to get the licence plates of the signholders and see if they are part of other dangerous groups such as Operation Rescue and the Christian Identity movement.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:15 PM | Link to this
Concerned:
VERY well put. According to Steve, you must not be from Georgia, as you can think!
“residents don’t want to draw sexual predators into their neighborhoods. I am not implying that all patrons are predators, but that places like this are a draw for them and fuels their fire for the perverted.”
By CommonSenseNotSoCommon
March 4, 2008 1:16 PM | Link to this
They can’t even find someone to have sex with them fro money. These are the very people who are in dire need of these businesses.
By Steve
March 4, 2008 1:19 PM | Link to this
Last I checked, these stores weren’t in “neighborhoods” but were in business districts.
I’m beginning to realize that conservatives live in fear about EVERYTHING.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:19 PM | Link to this
Jimmy,
Physical force? Nope…just a nice video tape that I can turn into the FBI looking for sexual predators violating their probation terms.
By Katie
March 4, 2008 1:27 PM | Link to this
Carol, are you sure your parents don’t have any whips or chains? How do you really know? Do you watch them have sex? What people choose to do behind their closed doors is THEIR business and no one else’s, including their children. Who knows, maybe your parents do get a little freaky and you just don’t know it. Afterall, you shouldn’t watching, now should you.
By Gimme Yo Dolla
March 4, 2008 1:28 PM | Link to this
The notion that perverts are ONLY going to the Loveshack and putting their neighborhoods at risk is stupid. I would think a restaurant like McDonald’s where kids play outside would be of greater concern than some store selling adult movies
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:33 PM | Link to this
Katie,
whatever they did was between them and fine, as long as it didn’t involve anyone else (or watching anyone else)…sex is meant to be experienced…
Are you cool with women being degraded like animals and exploited? You don’t sound like a true feminist to me.
By No ones business
March 4, 2008 1:34 PM | Link to this
Carol You said
*Because exploitation of women is not healthy sex.
If we showed men being victimized and raped, you be against it for sure…*
Are you saying there aren’t men in porns, or are you saying the women in the porn’s don’t like getting paid to ride a 10’ C**? Why do you care what people buy or do in their own homes? Take a look at the Catholics, their highest ranked leader f*** underage choirboys and you and use religion to justify your invasion of others privacy. So if we get ride of these places you think we will get rid of sex offenders? I say we get rid of religions and there would be less wars and children who get their salads tossed.
On another note, when I was younger and attended church, I was getting more than when I was in College, go figure.
By Katie
March 4, 2008 1:44 PM | Link to this
Carol, I wasn’t attacking you, just asking how you really knew what your parents do/did.
First, the people making the porn movies are paid porn actors—they do it by choice.
Second, I value most non human animals more than humans so if a human chooses to degrade themselves, once again, they do it by choice. Sex is the oldest industry in the world, sex sells. If it didn’t, people wouldn’t do it. If people didn’t want dildos, there wouldn’t be stores selling them. It’s kind of a supply/demand market, don’t you think? I don’t think it really has anything to do with feminism. Since you are obviously against the Love Shack, my advice to you would be to not shop there. By not giving them your business you are making your point. But why try to stop others from enjoying their sex life with toys, movies etc.., even if it differs from yours? Your fight against sexual predators is commendable, however, you’d have better luck finding a sexual predator at a local library or park.
By Katie
March 4, 2008 1:45 PM | Link to this
Carol, I wasn’t attacking you, just asking how you really knew what your parents do/did.
First, the people making the porn movies are paid porn actors—they do it by choice.
Second, I value most non human animals more than humans so if a human chooses to degrade themselves, once again, they do it by choice. Sex is the oldest industry in the world, sex sells. If it didn’t, people wouldn’t do it. If people didn’t want dildos, there wouldn’t be stores selling them. It’s kind of a supply/demand market, don’t you think? I don’t think it really has anything to do with feminism. Since you are obviously against the Love Shack, my advice to you would be to not shop there. By not giving them your business you are making your point. But why try to stop others from enjoying their sex life with toys, movies etc.., even if it differs from yours? Your fight against sexual predators is commendable, however, you’d have better luck finding a sexual predator at a local library or park.
By Casey
March 4, 2008 1:56 PM | Link to this
How many little Mom & Pop stores go out of business because there is not enough people spending money. Do the same thing, just don’t go. People will get tired of driving from other towns eventually.
By In addition.....
March 4, 2008 2:00 PM | Link to this
Pssst. You can buy all your naughty little do-dads online and have them sent directly to your home or post office box—no questions asked. You think sexual predators don’t know this?
By Mark
March 4, 2008 2:01 PM | Link to this
The people who oppose adult toy stores are the same ones who are too old to have sex. It’s simply jealousy. They’re to ignorant to realize that if it wasn’t for their parents rolling in the hay, they would just be a stain in a pair of panties.
By Steve
March 4, 2008 2:05 PM | Link to this
People are so worried about sexual predators and their children. Worry more about the guy talking on his cell phone and not paying attention to his driving - your children are at 100 times more risk of harm from bad drivers then from sexual predators.
By No ones business
March 4, 2008 2:07 PM | Link to this
Sorry, I intended to type “highest ranked leaders” (plural) not leader A.K.A the POPE. I would go to hell for that one.
By No ones business
March 4, 2008 2:07 PM | Link to this
Sorry, I intended to type “highest ranked leaders” (plural) not leader A.K.A the POPE. I would go to hell for that one.
By Patrick
March 4, 2008 2:08 PM | Link to this
Why are people so afraid of their own bodies? There is nothing wrong with enjoying your body. If you believe there is that is your right, but once again keep your laws off my body! Last time I checked me renting a porno or buying sex toy had ZERO affect on anyone else.
By Aceyman
March 4, 2008 2:09 PM | Link to this
It’s stupidity like these protests that make me ashamed to say those infamous three words: “I’m from Atlanta.”
The rest of the country thinks we’re all uneducated bumpkins thanks to people like this, so I must tip my cap and say “Thanks!” to all these ignorant fundies. I’m glad they are out there to ensure the south never becomes the cultural or intellectual equal of the rest of the country.
Pat yourself on the back people for a job well done.
By Patrick
March 4, 2008 2:09 PM | Link to this
Why are people so afraid of their own bodies? There is nothing wrong with enjoying your body. If you believe there is that is your right, but once again keep your laws off my body! Last time I checked me renting a porno or buying sex toy had ZERO affect on anyone else. As much as these bible thumpers want to try and make the case, everyone who frequents these places is not a pedophile or sexual deviant.
By Steve
March 4, 2008 2:13 PM | Link to this
I don’t get it. Sandy Springs has a PLETHORA of issues to deal with, and the last worry should be a strip join and 3 stores that sell porno movies.
What about traffic on Roswell Road? What about unchecked sprawl? What about your schools? What about section 8 housing issues and related crime?
By Singlemom
March 4, 2008 2:14 PM | Link to this
So, apparently, sex is bad…sex is gross and should be banned. Come on people…this is so stupid. I would love to go to the town hall meeting and ask the counsel and the citizens if they masterbate, fornicate or fantisize at all. There is no way you can tell me that these people who wholeheartedly believe that this place really is that bad. So what if there are fake penises and vaginas in there…or movies of people having sex….we all do it, we are all products of it…so what is wrong?? Why do these places always have to be so seedy?? Because the uptight citizens brigade has to make sex seem as if it is dirty…wrong and should be a shameful act. The only reason they are around is because of wives that won’t put out, so men have to sneak away and hide to get videos or go watch them..and the ones with video booths are so shady because the guys aren’t getting laid at home, so they have to let some strange man take care of his business….thus putting themselves at risk.
There is nothing wrong with these places, there is nothing wrong with sex….isn’t that why we are all here anyway??? Give me a break, if you notice the people that are so far against it are the uptight women who force their men to go into sexual hiding and travel across counties to go find a privately hidden adult store so that can look at something to remember what a naked body and what sex looks like. And the men who are so far against it…are just lying so that their woman wont get mad at them.
Give me a break people……if you aren’t sexually satisfied in your own relationship, then that is your problem. For those that need these kinds of places to hide from a fridged vanilla wife that won’t put out or do anything adventerous, then you have no one to blame but yourself….for those of us that are single…this is a form of safe sex. So shut your mouth people and do a little moaning of your own and maybe you won’t be so concerned with the rest of us that use these places as forms of spice in our sex life. They are not harbouring pedifiles….they are harbouring your husband who can’t get any because you won’t give it up once in a while. Maybe if you went in one then you would see that it isnt that bad.
By singlemom
March 4, 2008 2:18 PM | Link to this
…and by vanilla wife I mean a woman who is plain…wont do anything adventerous of the least bit kinky…..
By SKINFAN
March 4, 2008 2:29 PM | Link to this
Hey Jim, aer you that prudish?? Do you think that those who patronize these establishments are forced to go? No. They are independent thinking individuals who make a choice to go there. The establishments legally obtained business licenses and have set there businesses up accordingly. It’s numbed up dolts like you that make people WANT to go to these places. Relax a bit and enjoy. If you’re married, its a great place to go and spice up your marriage. If you and your siginicant other go there, its a great place to spice up your relationship. Oh and Jim there are Gays and Lesbians who go there as well….horrors!!! Let the businesses stay. If you don’t want to go there, then don’t go.
By SKINFAN
March 4, 2008 2:30 PM | Link to this
Hey Jim, aer you that prudish?? Do you think that those who patronize these establishments are forced to go? No. They are independent thinking individuals who make a choice to go there. The establishments legally obtained business licenses and have set there businesses up accordingly. It’s numbed up dolts like you that make people WANT to go to these places. Relax a bit and enjoy. If you’re married, its a great place to go and spice up your marriage. If you and your siginicant other go there, its a great place to spice up your relationship. Oh and Jim there are Gays and Lesbians who go there as well….horrors!!! Let the businesses stay. If you don’t want to go there, then don’t go.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Sex had a good run last week - as a topic in the news, I mean.
A church in a Florida publicly encouraged its married members to engage on conjugal gymnastics every day for a month. It had something to do with celebrating the joys of matrimonial life — and I’m guessing a few couples may have bolted for home before the offering plate was passed.
Closer to home, one of our sister cities to the north won a round in an ongoing legal battle to chase The Love Shack, purveyor of so-called adult merchandise, out of town. I smell an appeal in the air and once again wish I’d gone to law school because the lawyers are the true winners in these things. But back to sex.
By my count we have one strip club and two adult bookstores in the confines of our little burg, and this mightily offends many of our citizens. I’m offended as well, but for a different reason than most.
It offends me that there is enough local trade for these places to be profitable enough to remain open. Want to usher businesses like this out of Sandy Springs? Don’t dump it in the city council’s lap and hope they can concoct some law. Don’t picket or circulate petitions. Don’t form a coalition of concerned clergy and feminist groups. The solution is much easier.
Starve the rascals to death.
We may be loath to admit this, if there weren’t enough of us slapping down our dollars in these stores and clubs they wouldn’t exist. And, yes, I understand that not everyone patronizing these places is a Sandy Springsteen, but guess what? They aren’t staying open because people are coming from all over the metro area to get their thrills in our city.
In case you haven’t noticed, Sandy Springs is not the only place in metro Atlanta where you can buy sexually explicit videos or watch ladies dancing naked. So if these places are showing a profit the bulk of it is coming from the locals.
And until we shut off the faucet these places will be alive and well on Roswell Road. Maybe if we learned to respect each other, and have a little more reverence for sex, it would be a good start. Maybe then these places would lose their allure.
Perhaps that Florida pastor has it right — we’d be better served if sex was taken out of the retail/entertainment arena and put it into church. I’m not sure it necessarily belongs there, but it would be a big step up from where
Permalink | Comments (67) | Post your comment | Categories: Jim Osterman
Comments
By Tom
March 3, 2008 12:16 PM | Link to this
In short…..
The complainers aren’t buying, and the buyers aren’t complaining.
If you want to drive a store selling legal adult merchandise out of business, do it the American way….
Open a competitor with better selection and prices. Duh.
*
By C
March 3, 2008 1:22 PM | Link to this
There are 3 strip clubs, and three adult bookstores in Sandy Springs. Know your town and know your porn before writing.
By TNG
March 4, 2008 11:21 AM | Link to this
So there are these people who buy stuff there but hate the place? That’s a brilliant deduction - you’re a freakin’ genius Jim. HAHAHA!
By Harold
March 4, 2008 11:21 AM | Link to this
Sound like somebody need some more action in they own bedroom so they stop worryin about the bedrooms of others! Mine your own business, dummy!
By Katie
March 4, 2008 11:33 AM | Link to this
Oh my god, sex is bad!! please, everyone does it. If you don’t like the love shack, don’t shop there—it really is THAT simple. All you bible thumping morons need to get over yourself.
By robo
March 4, 2008 11:38 AM | Link to this
What’s new? Sex sells. Always has and always will.
By Troy
March 4, 2008 11:39 AM | Link to this
The patrons are all of us from Cobb coming across the river to Sandy Spings!
By No Dawgs Here
March 4, 2008 11:41 AM | Link to this
OK. I got an idea. Those that oppose China, go and protest outside all the Wal-Marts.(IE; China’s #1 customer) Those that don’t believe in god, go and hold up “God is a lie” banners outside all the churches. Some people really just need to get a life. Geez… Protest this protest that. It’s a business. Not anything else. If you don’t like it, go somewhere else. I don’t like to eat at Sonny’s BBQ, does that mean I can hold up signs and try to close them down? I agree some radical “Bible thumpers” need to do less judging and let he that can only judge do the judging.
By Patrick
March 4, 2008 11:43 AM | Link to this
You forgot about Mardi Gras Gentleman’s club in Powers Ferry Landing. It’s well hidden behind some trees on a hill, but it’s in Sandy Springs as well.
By Keon
March 4, 2008 11:54 AM | Link to this
It’s ridiculous…
If they are not violating the law then I don’t see a problem. I’m sure there can be some sort of compromise. I can understand not wanting a place like this in view of children. I recall that was a problem before if I recall. Cover the windows, have the entrance facing the back etc… Tax revenue is tax revenue!
To my understanding you can’t have a business of this nature near a house of worship or a place where children congregate(school, daycare etc..) You also can’t have vulgar displays in the window. If these things are being done then what’s the problem?
I wish I could have one in my neighborhood…actually I prefer Southern Nights and Insurrections!:)
These store fulfill a need/want and attempting to say they don’t is ridiculous!
By bameroni
March 4, 2008 12:02 PM | Link to this
I’m sorry; at least these places pay taxes that support “your” community and the local church and church-related organizations do not.
By Ryan Tucker
March 4, 2008 12:03 PM | Link to this
Sandy Springs happens to be in America. And in America we get to shop where we want. We also get to protest where we want. I don’t care if the bible-thumping idiots want to protest, I just hope they realize it’s a waste of time.
By Now ain't that sumthin'
March 4, 2008 12:07 PM | Link to this
All of this talk of the Love Shack is making me horny!
By Now ain't that sumthin'
March 4, 2008 12:07 PM | Link to this
All of this talk of the Love Shack is making me horny!
By Lost
March 4, 2008 12:15 PM | Link to this
Can some one give me directions to the Love Shack. My pastor is fresh out of lube.
By JPW
March 4, 2008 12:20 PM | Link to this
Oh my god!! What a people choose to buy to use in there own house is no concern of anyone else. If people want to buy videos, toys, joke gifts, and so on who cares.
People act as if a woman buying a vibrater is buying an M-16. Change your mindset! One kills people the other brings pleasure. Oh God she has a dildo!!! Oh God he purchased a blow-up doll and DVD’s!! Run for the hills. Get over yourselves. If a couple wants to walk into a store and buy whips, chain, and all the other interesting things that they can so be it. Are they affecting you? No!
People protest based on moral decay! Here look in the mirror you are the cause of it as much as anyone. Deal with it; this is the world we built not just me. The protesters say they sell to minors, again wrong. The Bars, Clubs, and the Stores all card and if you are 18 you are asked to leave. I have been there and been carded. Face facts most people that are protesting the Love Shack, The Pink Ponie, and all the others have never been into one. You want moral decay look at how you are raising your children to look down at others.
The sex industry whether it is prostitution or a store like the love shack is doing the world a favor, and taking a risk to do so. Rapes have gone DOWN in Las Vegas since they have legalized it. What does that say? What about the people that for whatever reason are not attractive to other people or do not have the social skills to entertain people why should they not have a place to help them create their fansty and make them feel good about themselves?
The people who waste their time protesting these businesses are just sad. If they would put as much effort in to their own families, their schools, and simply their own lives maybe just maybe some of the issues that do effect them like violence, kids shooting each other, drugs, and other issues would go down.
The short of it is this places are not doing anything harmful, people may not like them but no one is holding a gun to anyone head to go into them. People may not like the why they look in a shopping plaza, by a church, or by some other institution, and that is their opinion and opinions do not make laws. In some cases these businesses were there first before a church or a strip mall, in which cases people knew what they were building by.
In closing I just want to say that the human body is a wonderful thing a true work of art and these businesses are just celebrating this fact, why condemn them for it?
By Tertius
March 4, 2008 12:22 PM | Link to this
Good points. Sex is sinfully cheapened and degraded and perverted when it’s a commercial exploit. Churches should do more to address the proper role of sex: joyfully in the commitment of marriage. But even that message cannot be divorced from the Gospel which provides the fuller context for how people are to live before a holy God.
But yes, I stand with you that rather than moralistic legal action, churches and concerned citizens would do well to promote a positive, healthy, Christian view of joyful sex within marriage, and to with gentleness and grace address the life-destroying effects of sexual sins like pornography.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:33 PM | Link to this
I’ve got a solution to shut them down: have two people with running video cameras at all times the store is open. One filing the licence plates of the cars who come in, and go out, and one filing the patrons entering and leaving. That way, if someone is a registered sex offender and is patronizing the place, the evidence is there to send them back to jail. So really 2 problems are solved! Less sex offenders on the streets in SS, and less people who are closet sex offenders, which would entirely shut the place down!
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:33 PM | Link to this
I’ve got a solution to shut them down: have two people with running video cameras at all times the store is open. One filing the licence plates of the cars who come in, and go out, and one filming the patrons entering and leaving. That way, if someone is a registered sex offender and is patronizing the place, the evidence is there to send them back to jail. So really 2 problems are solved! Less sex offenders on the streets in SS, and less people who are closet sex offenders, which would entirely shut the place down!
By MW
March 4, 2008 12:33 PM | Link to this
bameroni,
Please give me a break! Please don’t compare this trash to the local church based on sales tax revenue. Poor argument, please try again.
By RevIke
March 4, 2008 12:35 PM | Link to this
Remember, You can have sex in Sandy Springs, Just don’t use gadgets or tell your neighbors.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:37 PM | Link to this
JPW,
Because exploitation of women is not healthy sex.
If we showed men being victimized and raped, you be against it for sure…
By harold
March 4, 2008 12:37 PM | Link to this
IF THE AJC DIDNT DRUM THIS UP, THERE WOULDNT BE NO PROTESTORS. AJC IS THE GUILTY PARTY.
By curiouser and curiouser
March 4, 2008 12:39 PM | Link to this
Jim, if the citizens of Sandy Springs want to patronize these establishments, who are you to say they can’t? The entire premise of a “free” country is exactly that: “freedom”. If the establishments weren’t welcome, they WOULD die out from lack of business. Except they aren’t dying out. That tells me you’re in the minority on this one, huh, and the Sandy Springs residents do welcome these establishments.
(BTW: The correct answer is “You aren’t ANYONE to say they can’t, and so you should STFU, GBTW, and quit trying to dictate others’ actions based on moral pronouncements from your personal sky fairy.”)
By Pat
March 4, 2008 12:40 PM | Link to this
Come on, let’s focus on something that really matters. Why is the American society so afraid of sex, when everyone does it, wants to do it, and wants to watch it. These places are in business zones and not across the street from a school. I don’t see any strippers in windows - like Amsterdam - so what’s the problem. We have no compassion in this country for the exact human desire that brought us here. And sex in church, within the sanctity of marriage, who cares.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:47 PM | Link to this
Pat, My parents were married, not engaging in orgies, with mutilations, whips, chains and the like.
Last time I checked, I am still an American and I have a right to protest anything I like (at least until the one of the two Christian-hating Communists get elected this Fall!)…
By Steve
March 4, 2008 12:51 PM | Link to this
Only in this backwards hick state would we even be having this discussion.
Last time I checked:
a: this is a free country b: children aren’t allowed in the stores c: sex is not bad, or evil, or naughty. Honestly. d: it brings in tax income e: sex toys spice up boring married and single sex lives f: videos keep folks from looking elsewhere for sex
Get a Grip and Join the 21st Century.
By gttim
March 4, 2008 12:52 PM | Link to this
Yeah, because there are not more important issues we should be concerned about. Sandy Springs incorporated because they were tired of Fulton County spending money in ways they did not approve of and making laws they did not like. So now Sandy Springs is going to spend money on things most of it citizens do not care about and make laws that most of its citizens do not want. Nice!
BTW, you can get much better prices over the internet, but by buying in person you get to make sure everything is the correct size.
Was it Dear Abby or Ann Landers who asked a minister if it was alright to have sex before church? The minister said it was fine as long as you did not block the isle. We need more people who do not take things so seriously.
By rt
March 4, 2008 12:53 PM | Link to this
What do you want to bet that some of those same bilble thumpers are back tonight as patrons. Remember, bible thumpers, CHOIR BOYS ALL TALK SOONER OR LATER. The lube is on the left when you go in.
By get a life
March 4, 2008 12:55 PM | Link to this
The bed of the married is undefiled. Me and my husband who are both Christans were just in the Love Shack 2 weeks ago! and the night ended wonderfully!! People need to mind there business about what others choose to do or incorporate in their bedrooms. At least we can tell who’s unhappy and who’s sex life is boring. If a couple chooses to watch porn together or whatever that is their decision and no one has a right to say what or what GROWN people should or should not be doing. As for the sex offenders, would you rather then get a porn movie or go prey on some kid again? I say get a porn get yourself off and leave the babies alone!
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:55 PM | Link to this
Steve, BS, Every sex offender has 2 things in his house (prove me wrong, and I’ll believe you): 1.Running Water 2.PORN
By Steve
March 4, 2008 12:56 PM | Link to this
Carol, My parents had a codependent alcoholic marriage, so what’s your point? Who cares what your or my parents did. This is the 21st century.
Evolve.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 12:56 PM | Link to this
Steve, BS, Every sex offender has 2 things in his house (prove me wrong, and I’ll believe you): 1.Running Water 2.PORN
By Conga
March 4, 2008 12:58 PM | Link to this
Just like the Sunday liquor debate, if you don’t like naked women gyrating in front of you then don’t visit a strip club. Just like if you don’t want to drink on Sunday then you don’t have to buy alcohol-but let us who want-should be able to on Sundays, don’t tell me what I can and can’t do just because you don’t agree with the majority!
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:00 PM | Link to this
Get a Life,
So the Ten Commandments are optional to others but not you and your husband? I don’t get it(??)
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:01 PM | Link to this
Get a Life,
So the Ten Commandments are optional to others but not you and your husband? I don’t get it(??)
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:03 PM | Link to this
Steve,
I don’t want to evolve back into an animal: that’s why they call us “civilized”. we can reason, we have self-control (??)…
By 1 more thing
March 4, 2008 1:05 PM | Link to this
look at some of these women in the line with the pickets. That will give you an idea of the type of woman that’s protesting this place.
Old - Angry - Fat -Hillary Clinton Supporters.
You don’t see any long legged - fantastic body - gorgeous - hot women protesting - do ya?
That’s the problem - these women gave up on sex - years ago. Would you wanna have sex with any of these women in the picture.
They let themselves go - and have no sex life! They are otta shape and disgusting.
Because their sex life stinks - they want to crawl in your bedroom window, and make sure your not having any fun either!
GET A LIFE HONEY!
GET A GYM MEMBERSHIP AND A MAKEOVER WHILE YOUR AT IT!
Victoria’s Secret does not come in XXXL
By Steve
March 4, 2008 1:07 PM | Link to this
Carol, guess what - I’m not a sex offender and I have porn and running water in my house. What is your point?
What is wrong with people in Georgia? It’s like you people don’t think.
By Concerned
March 4, 2008 1:08 PM | Link to this
Perhaps those of you who claim that the Love Shack is operating legally should do THEIR homework before saying the holy rollers should live and let live. Also they should learn of the dangerous “activities” that take place in the Love Shack locations. In reality, residents don’t want to draw sexual predators into their neighborhoods. I am not implying that all patrons are predators, but that places like this are a draw for them and fuels their fire for the perverted. I appreciate the article, but there will always be those who see no reason to resist this base type of entertainment. The best we can do is be sure they are operating legally. The Johns Creek location is still open even though they lost the court battle to remain open. I’m not sure what is up with law enforcement there, but Mr. Cornetta (Love Shack owner) has ZERO respect for the laws of the land.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:11 PM | Link to this
1 More Thing:
What do YOU look like?
I’m not fat…do you want me to be fat so you’re right? Most gorgeous women I know agree, but they are working. I’d be there myself, except I have to work as well. Those people have a right to protect their children, grandchildren, etc. from sex perverts.
By CommonSenseNotSoCommon
March 4, 2008 1:12 PM | Link to this
Those wonderful holy-ghost-filled-saved-&-sanctified folks in Sandy Springs aren’t buying novelty toys! They’re hitting their neigbors and paying for the real thing on Ponce-De-Leon, Metropolitan Ave (formerly Stewart Avenue), Ashby Street. They can also be found on cheating on their spouses having same sex affairs online and having rendez-vous at high end hotels. So they have no need for the novelty toys!
To all I say - Let’s go shopping in Sandy Springs! Hell - I am going to buy something for my wife today!!!
By jimmy k
March 4, 2008 1:14 PM | Link to this
These prudish fundys don’t have anything better to do than protest a legal business offering legal products to people who can choose of their own free will to enter the store or not. They are pathetic, miserable worms. Of course, when someone is convinced “God told me to do X” then no amount of logic or reason can disuade them. The protesters would be far more likely to initiate physical force against other people than the customers at Love Shack. Perhaps the FBI would do better to get the licence plates of the signholders and see if they are part of other dangerous groups such as Operation Rescue and the Christian Identity movement.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:15 PM | Link to this
Concerned:
VERY well put. According to Steve, you must not be from Georgia, as you can think!
“residents don’t want to draw sexual predators into their neighborhoods. I am not implying that all patrons are predators, but that places like this are a draw for them and fuels their fire for the perverted.”
By CommonSenseNotSoCommon
March 4, 2008 1:16 PM | Link to this
They can’t even find someone to have sex with them fro money. These are the very people who are in dire need of these businesses.
By Steve
March 4, 2008 1:19 PM | Link to this
Last I checked, these stores weren’t in “neighborhoods” but were in business districts.
I’m beginning to realize that conservatives live in fear about EVERYTHING.
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:19 PM | Link to this
Jimmy,
Physical force? Nope…just a nice video tape that I can turn into the FBI looking for sexual predators violating their probation terms.
By Katie
March 4, 2008 1:27 PM | Link to this
Carol, are you sure your parents don’t have any whips or chains? How do you really know? Do you watch them have sex? What people choose to do behind their closed doors is THEIR business and no one else’s, including their children. Who knows, maybe your parents do get a little freaky and you just don’t know it. Afterall, you shouldn’t watching, now should you.
By Gimme Yo Dolla
March 4, 2008 1:28 PM | Link to this
The notion that perverts are ONLY going to the Loveshack and putting their neighborhoods at risk is stupid. I would think a restaurant like McDonald’s where kids play outside would be of greater concern than some store selling adult movies
By Carol
March 4, 2008 1:33 PM | Link to this
Katie,
whatever they did was between them and fine, as long as it didn’t involve anyone else (or watching anyone else)…sex is meant to be experienced…
Are you cool with women being degraded like animals and exploited? You don’t sound like a true feminist to me.
By No ones business
March 4, 2008 1:34 PM | Link to this
Carol You said
*Because exploitation of women is not healthy sex.
If we showed men being victimized and raped, you be against it for sure…*
Are you saying there aren’t men in porns, or are you saying the women in the porn’s don’t like getting paid to ride a 10’ C**? Why do you care what people buy or do in their own homes? Take a look at the Catholics, their highest ranked leader f*** underage choirboys and you and use religion to justify your invasion of others privacy. So if we get ride of these places you think we will get rid of sex offenders? I say we get rid of religions and there would be less wars and children who get their salads tossed.
On another note, when I was younger and attended church, I was getting more than when I was in College, go figure.
By Katie
March 4, 2008 1:44 PM | Link to this
Carol, I wasn’t attacking you, just asking how you really knew what your parents do/did.
First, the people making the porn movies are paid porn actors—they do it by choice.
Second, I value most non human animals more than humans so if a human chooses to degrade themselves, once again, they do it by choice. Sex is the oldest industry in the world, sex sells. If it didn’t, people wouldn’t do it. If people didn’t want dildos, there wouldn’t be stores selling them. It’s kind of a supply/demand market, don’t you think? I don’t think it really has anything to do with feminism. Since you are obviously against the Love Shack, my advice to you would be to not shop there. By not giving them your business you are making your point. But why try to stop others from enjoying their sex life with toys, movies etc.., even if it differs from yours? Your fight against sexual predators is commendable, however, you’d have better luck finding a sexual predator at a local library or park.
By Katie
March 4, 2008 1:45 PM | Link to this
Carol, I wasn’t attacking you, just asking how you really knew what your parents do/did.
First, the people making the porn movies are paid porn actors—they do it by choice.
Second, I value most non human animals more than humans so if a human chooses to degrade themselves, once again, they do it by choice. Sex is the oldest industry in the world, sex sells. If it didn’t, people wouldn’t do it. If people didn’t want dildos, there wouldn’t be stores selling them. It’s kind of a supply/demand market, don’t you think? I don’t think it really has anything to do with feminism. Since you are obviously against the Love Shack, my advice to you would be to not shop there. By not giving them your business you are making your point. But why try to stop others from enjoying their sex life with toys, movies etc.., even if it differs from yours? Your fight against sexual predators is commendable, however, you’d have better luck finding a sexual predator at a local library or park.
By Casey
March 4, 2008 1:56 PM | Link to this
How many little Mom & Pop stores go out of business because there is not enough people spending money. Do the same thing, just don’t go. People will get tired of driving from other towns eventually.
By In addition.....
March 4, 2008 2:00 PM | Link to this
Pssst. You can buy all your naughty little do-dads online and have them sent directly to your home or post office box—no questions asked. You think sexual predators don’t know this?
By Mark
March 4, 2008 2:01 PM | Link to this
The people who oppose adult toy stores are the same ones who are too old to have sex. It’s simply jealousy. They’re to ignorant to realize that if it wasn’t for their parents rolling in the hay, they would just be a stain in a pair of panties.
By Steve
March 4, 2008 2:05 PM | Link to this
People are so worried about sexual predators and their children. Worry more about the guy talking on his cell phone and not paying attention to his driving - your children are at 100 times more risk of harm from bad drivers then from sexual predators.
By No ones business
March 4, 2008 2:07 PM | Link to this
Sorry, I intended to type “highest ranked leaders” (plural) not leader A.K.A the POPE. I would go to hell for that one.
By No ones business
March 4, 2008 2:07 PM | Link to this
Sorry, I intended to type “highest ranked leaders” (plural) not leader A.K.A the POPE. I would go to hell for that one.
By Patrick
March 4, 2008 2:08 PM | Link to this
Why are people so afraid of their own bodies? There is nothing wrong with enjoying your body. If you believe there is that is your right, but once again keep your laws off my body! Last time I checked me renting a porno or buying sex toy had ZERO affect on anyone else.
By Aceyman
March 4, 2008 2:09 PM | Link to this
It’s stupidity like these protests that make me ashamed to say those infamous three words: “I’m from Atlanta.”
The rest of the country thinks we’re all uneducated bumpkins thanks to people like this, so I must tip my cap and say “Thanks!” to all these ignorant fundies. I’m glad they are out there to ensure the south never becomes the cultural or intellectual equal of the rest of the country.
Pat yourself on the back people for a job well done.
By Patrick
March 4, 2008 2:09 PM | Link to this
Why are people so afraid of their own bodies? There is nothing wrong with enjoying your body. If you believe there is that is your right, but once again keep your laws off my body! Last time I checked me renting a porno or buying sex toy had ZERO affect on anyone else. As much as these bible thumpers want to try and make the case, everyone who frequents these places is not a pedophile or sexual deviant.
By Steve
March 4, 2008 2:13 PM | Link to this
I don’t get it. Sandy Springs has a PLETHORA of issues to deal with, and the last worry should be a strip join and 3 stores that sell porno movies.
What about traffic on Roswell Road? What about unchecked sprawl? What about your schools? What about section 8 housing issues and related crime?
By Singlemom
March 4, 2008 2:14 PM | Link to this
So, apparently, sex is bad…sex is gross and should be banned. Come on people…this is so stupid. I would love to go to the town hall meeting and ask the counsel and the citizens if they masterbate, fornicate or fantisize at all. There is no way you can tell me that these people who wholeheartedly believe that this place really is that bad. So what if there are fake penises and vaginas in there…or movies of people having sex….we all do it, we are all products of it…so what is wrong?? Why do these places always have to be so seedy?? Because the uptight citizens brigade has to make sex seem as if it is dirty…wrong and should be a shameful act. The only reason they are around is because of wives that won’t put out, so men have to sneak away and hide to get videos or go watch them..and the ones with video booths are so shady because the guys aren’t getting laid at home, so they have to let some strange man take care of his business….thus putting themselves at risk.
There is nothing wrong with these places, there is nothing wrong with sex….isn’t that why we are all here anyway??? Give me a break, if you notice the people that are so far against it are the uptight women who force their men to go into sexual hiding and travel across counties to go find a privately hidden adult store so that can look at something to remember what a naked body and what sex looks like. And the men who are so far against it…are just lying so that their woman wont get mad at them.
Give me a break people……if you aren’t sexually satisfied in your own relationship, then that is your problem. For those that need these kinds of places to hide from a fridged vanilla wife that won’t put out or do anything adventerous, then you have no one to blame but yourself….for those of us that are single…this is a form of safe sex. So shut your mouth people and do a little moaning of your own and maybe you won’t be so concerned with the rest of us that use these places as forms of spice in our sex life. They are not harbouring pedifiles….they are harbouring your husband who can’t get any because you won’t give it up once in a while. Maybe if you went in one then you would see that it isnt that bad.
By singlemom
March 4, 2008 2:18 PM | Link to this
…and by vanilla wife I mean a woman who is plain…wont do anything adventerous of the least bit kinky…..
By SKINFAN
March 4, 2008 2:29 PM | Link to this
Hey Jim, aer you that prudish?? Do you think that those who patronize these establishments are forced to go? No. They are independent thinking individuals who make a choice to go there. The establishments legally obtained business licenses and have set there businesses up accordingly. It’s numbed up dolts like you that make people WANT to go to these places. Relax a bit and enjoy. If you’re married, its a great place to go and spice up your marriage. If you and your siginicant other go there, its a great place to spice up your relationship. Oh and Jim there are Gays and Lesbians who go there as well….horrors!!! Let the businesses stay. If you don’t want to go there, then don’t go.
By SKINFAN
March 4, 2008 2:30 PM | Link to this
Hey Jim, aer you that prudish?? Do you think that those who patronize these establishments are forced to go? No. They are independent thinking individuals who make a choice to go there. The establishments legally obtained business licenses and have set there businesses up accordingly. It’s numbed up dolts like you that make people WANT to go to these places. Relax a bit and enjoy. If you’re married, its a great place to go and spice up your marriage. If you and your siginicant other go there, its a great place to spice up your relationship. Oh and Jim there are Gays and Lesbians who go there as well….horrors!!! Let the businesses stay. If you don’t want to go there, then don’t go.
Friday, February 29, 2008
Embattled Love Shack Buys Some Time
Owner John Cornetta applies for business license
By Mike Albo
Posted: 11:54 AM PST Feb 29, 2008
JOHNS CREEK, Ga. - A Fulton Superior Court judge, in a written order issued yesterday, told John Cornetta, the embattled owner of adult video chain the Love Shack, that he may not operate an adult business at its current Johns Creek location, and that Cornetta must have a regular business license or close his store.
Cornetta managed a reprieve, however, by applying for a regular business license on Tuesday. The application comes with a grace period of up to 30 days during which time a business can operate without a license while the application is being processed.
For its part, the city holds that if code inspectors determine the Love Shack exceeds one of the thresholds used by the city to define a sexually oriented business, it will ask judge Ural Glanville to enforce the judge's order, which could include closing the store or fining Cornetta. It's possible that Cornetta could also be jailed for contempt.
City Attorney Bill Riley told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, "He [Cornetta] is still subject to the judge's order on not operating a sexually oriented business." Riley added, "I believe the defendant will follow any orders issued by a judge."
In a document filed with the court this week, Cornetta's attorney, Cary Wiggins, indicated that the judge's order fails to consider First Amendment issues. These issues could signal more lengthy court battles involving the Love Shack.
Glanville's latest order is seen as a major victory for the city of Johns Creek, which has long held that the Love Shack is operating illegally in a location not zoned for adult busineses.
Mayor Mike Bodker told the Journal-Constitution that the judge's order is, "...total victory, but it's one step in a long process. It's winning a battle, not the war. It's a big battle. He's at the end of a rope, holding on to the knot, and it's about to slip."
By Mike Albo
Posted: 11:54 AM PST Feb 29, 2008
JOHNS CREEK, Ga. - A Fulton Superior Court judge, in a written order issued yesterday, told John Cornetta, the embattled owner of adult video chain the Love Shack, that he may not operate an adult business at its current Johns Creek location, and that Cornetta must have a regular business license or close his store.
Cornetta managed a reprieve, however, by applying for a regular business license on Tuesday. The application comes with a grace period of up to 30 days during which time a business can operate without a license while the application is being processed.
For its part, the city holds that if code inspectors determine the Love Shack exceeds one of the thresholds used by the city to define a sexually oriented business, it will ask judge Ural Glanville to enforce the judge's order, which could include closing the store or fining Cornetta. It's possible that Cornetta could also be jailed for contempt.
City Attorney Bill Riley told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, "He [Cornetta] is still subject to the judge's order on not operating a sexually oriented business." Riley added, "I believe the defendant will follow any orders issued by a judge."
In a document filed with the court this week, Cornetta's attorney, Cary Wiggins, indicated that the judge's order fails to consider First Amendment issues. These issues could signal more lengthy court battles involving the Love Shack.
Glanville's latest order is seen as a major victory for the city of Johns Creek, which has long held that the Love Shack is operating illegally in a location not zoned for adult busineses.
Mayor Mike Bodker told the Journal-Constitution that the judge's order is, "...total victory, but it's one step in a long process. It's winning a battle, not the war. It's a big battle. He's at the end of a rope, holding on to the knot, and it's about to slip."
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Love Shack owner applies for license, buys time
By DOUG NURSE
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 02/28/08
In a written order issued Thursday, a Fulton Superior Court judge told the owner of an adult video chain that he may not operate a sexually oriented business at its current Johns Creek location, and that he must have a regular business license or close his store.
But John Cornetta, the owner of the Love Shack, bought himself more time by applying for a regular business license on Tuesday. The application carries a grace period of up to 30 days in which a business, including Cornetta's, can operate without a license while the application is being processed.
If city code inspectors find the store exceeds one of the thresholds used by the city to define a sexually oriented business, the city would ask the judge, Ural Glanville, to enforce the order, which could include closing the store or fining Cornetta — or even jailing him for contempt.
"He is still subject to the judge's order on not operating a sexually oriented business," said City Attorney Bill Riley. "I believe the defendant will follow any orders issued by a judge."
Cornetta's attorney, Cary Wiggins, said in a document filed with the court this week that the judge's order fails to take into account First Amendment issues, which could signal another lengthy court battle, during which the store may remain open.
Thursday's order by Glanville represents a major victory for the city of Johns Creek, which has long argued that the Love Shack located at Jones and State Bridge roads is a sexually oriented store operating illegally in an area not zoned for adult businesses.
"It's an absolute, total victory," said Mayor Mike Bodker, "but it's one step in a long process. It's winning a battle, not the war. It's a big battle. He's at the end of a rope, holding on to the knot, and it's about to slip."
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 02/28/08
In a written order issued Thursday, a Fulton Superior Court judge told the owner of an adult video chain that he may not operate a sexually oriented business at its current Johns Creek location, and that he must have a regular business license or close his store.
But John Cornetta, the owner of the Love Shack, bought himself more time by applying for a regular business license on Tuesday. The application carries a grace period of up to 30 days in which a business, including Cornetta's, can operate without a license while the application is being processed.
If city code inspectors find the store exceeds one of the thresholds used by the city to define a sexually oriented business, the city would ask the judge, Ural Glanville, to enforce the order, which could include closing the store or fining Cornetta — or even jailing him for contempt.
"He is still subject to the judge's order on not operating a sexually oriented business," said City Attorney Bill Riley. "I believe the defendant will follow any orders issued by a judge."
Cornetta's attorney, Cary Wiggins, said in a document filed with the court this week that the judge's order fails to take into account First Amendment issues, which could signal another lengthy court battle, during which the store may remain open.
Thursday's order by Glanville represents a major victory for the city of Johns Creek, which has long argued that the Love Shack located at Jones and State Bridge roads is a sexually oriented store operating illegally in an area not zoned for adult businesses.
"It's an absolute, total victory," said Mayor Mike Bodker, "but it's one step in a long process. It's winning a battle, not the war. It's a big battle. He's at the end of a rope, holding on to the knot, and it's about to slip."
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Judge: Love Shack lacks required license
Judge: Love Shack lacks required license
Close or comply, adult-themed store is told
By Doug Nurse
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 02/24/08
A Fulton County Superior Court judge last week handed the city of Johns Creek a significant legal victory over the Love Shack, an adult-themed store.
In his ruling from the bench, Judge Ural Glanville said the Love Shack doesn't have a required 2007 business license and must close if it does not comply with city ordinances.
The closure order doesn't take effect until the judge signs a written order, which could come as soon as Monday.
"We're happy with the judge's order because it vindicates that this business is operating illegally since the city's inception [Dec. 1, 2006] and brings us one step closer to either it operates in compliance under our laws or it closes its doors," said Mayor Mike Bodker.
In March, the city denied a regular business application sought by the adult-video chain owner, John Cornetta, but the store has continued operating anyway.
Johns Creek officials wanted a court order to shut the controversial store or make Cornetta comply with city ordinances.
Lawyers from both camps cautioned against drawing conclusions until the judge signs a written order, because the order could include important nuances.
Cornetta said he is in compliance with the city ordinance and will apply for a business license for the current year
Close or comply, adult-themed store is told
By Doug Nurse
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 02/24/08
A Fulton County Superior Court judge last week handed the city of Johns Creek a significant legal victory over the Love Shack, an adult-themed store.
In his ruling from the bench, Judge Ural Glanville said the Love Shack doesn't have a required 2007 business license and must close if it does not comply with city ordinances.
The closure order doesn't take effect until the judge signs a written order, which could come as soon as Monday.
"We're happy with the judge's order because it vindicates that this business is operating illegally since the city's inception [Dec. 1, 2006] and brings us one step closer to either it operates in compliance under our laws or it closes its doors," said Mayor Mike Bodker.
In March, the city denied a regular business application sought by the adult-video chain owner, John Cornetta, but the store has continued operating anyway.
Johns Creek officials wanted a court order to shut the controversial store or make Cornetta comply with city ordinances.
Lawyers from both camps cautioned against drawing conclusions until the judge signs a written order, because the order could include important nuances.
Cornetta said he is in compliance with the city ordinance and will apply for a business license for the current year
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Shut down the love shack store!
Shut down the love shack store!
it is perverted
February 23, 2008 | 09:21 AM
It is time to shut down the Love shack in Johns Creek. That kind of filth is not needed in north Fulton. People should not be buying or using the bizarre perverted "devices" these people sell. This is a Christian community and we must stop this kind of perversion from infecting our youth. With the community's help we can turn back the tide of this kind of sexual immorality and reclaim America for our Lord and savior.
Donald F.
it is perverted
February 23, 2008 | 09:21 AM
It is time to shut down the Love shack in Johns Creek. That kind of filth is not needed in north Fulton. People should not be buying or using the bizarre perverted "devices" these people sell. This is a Christian community and we must stop this kind of perversion from infecting our youth. With the community's help we can turn back the tide of this kind of sexual immorality and reclaim America for our Lord and savior.
Donald F.
Friday, February 22, 2008
Love Shack Owner Undaunted by Court Order
'This doesn't affect us,' says John Cornetta
By Peter Warren
Posted: 4:54 PM PST Feb 22, 2008
JOHNS CREEK, Ga. - Love Shack owner John Cornetta was ordered by a Fulton County Superior Court judge Thursday to comply with city ordinances or face closure as soon as Monday, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Judge Ural Glanville said Cornetta has been operating the store without a required 2007 business license, which he was denied last March. Cornetta however maintained that he is in compliance with the city's requirements for the license, and plans to re-apply for 2008.
"In the big scheme of things, it's not an important victory for the other side," Cornetta told AVN. "It's dealing with a 2007 business license - the last time I checked, this is 2008. Johns Creek is claiming a little bit of a victory, but in actuality ... this doesn't affect us. It really doesn't. We're used to [decisions] going against us, and we're still here and we're still open. And we'll be open tomorrow, and we'll be open Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and so on."
That remains to be seen, though. The store cannot be closed until the judge signs a written order, but that could happen Monday.
Mayor Mike Bodker said, "We're happy with the judge's order because it vindicates that this business is operating illegally since the city's inception [Dec. 1, 2006] and brings us one step closer [...] either it operates in compliance under our laws or it closes its doors."
For a regular business license in Johns Creek, a store must have no more than 25 percent of its floor space dedicated to adult products, or the same amount of its revenue derived from them. Also, restricting admission to patrons aged 18 or older could classify an establishment as an adult business.
Cornetta said the Love Shack's inventory meets the criteria for a regular business license, and that minors are allowed on the premises if accompanied by an adult or guardian.
"We'll appeal the order for sure," Cornetta said, "but not because there's anything we can do by winning an appeal. If we win an appeal, what do we win? The only thing it does is it helps us not to create bad law, and I'm one of the operators in the U.S. that will not allow bad law to be created. I'll appeal things even when there's no real upside of doing it, other than not having bad law created.
"This judge erred, in my opinion," he went on. "He erred in a lot of people's opinion - Cary Wiggins, Louis Sirkin, Steve Youngleson, attorneys that are friends of mine that work with me. All of us met today, and beyond a shadow of a doubt, the judge - a very good judge, intelligent judge - he erred in that there is an affirmative defense, at least one affirmative defense, to the question that was brought forward, and in Georgia that's enough where the judge cannot rule on issues that have to do with the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution or the Georgia Constitution, and he did.
"But he said from the bench, 'It's not a padlock order; you simply have to comply and get a 2008 business license,' and we are complying," Cornetta concluded. "So we'll just apply for 2008 and appeal his decision at the same time. Small potato stuff."
By Peter Warren
Posted: 4:54 PM PST Feb 22, 2008
JOHNS CREEK, Ga. - Love Shack owner John Cornetta was ordered by a Fulton County Superior Court judge Thursday to comply with city ordinances or face closure as soon as Monday, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Judge Ural Glanville said Cornetta has been operating the store without a required 2007 business license, which he was denied last March. Cornetta however maintained that he is in compliance with the city's requirements for the license, and plans to re-apply for 2008.
"In the big scheme of things, it's not an important victory for the other side," Cornetta told AVN. "It's dealing with a 2007 business license - the last time I checked, this is 2008. Johns Creek is claiming a little bit of a victory, but in actuality ... this doesn't affect us. It really doesn't. We're used to [decisions] going against us, and we're still here and we're still open. And we'll be open tomorrow, and we'll be open Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and so on."
That remains to be seen, though. The store cannot be closed until the judge signs a written order, but that could happen Monday.
Mayor Mike Bodker said, "We're happy with the judge's order because it vindicates that this business is operating illegally since the city's inception [Dec. 1, 2006] and brings us one step closer [...] either it operates in compliance under our laws or it closes its doors."
For a regular business license in Johns Creek, a store must have no more than 25 percent of its floor space dedicated to adult products, or the same amount of its revenue derived from them. Also, restricting admission to patrons aged 18 or older could classify an establishment as an adult business.
Cornetta said the Love Shack's inventory meets the criteria for a regular business license, and that minors are allowed on the premises if accompanied by an adult or guardian.
"We'll appeal the order for sure," Cornetta said, "but not because there's anything we can do by winning an appeal. If we win an appeal, what do we win? The only thing it does is it helps us not to create bad law, and I'm one of the operators in the U.S. that will not allow bad law to be created. I'll appeal things even when there's no real upside of doing it, other than not having bad law created.
"This judge erred, in my opinion," he went on. "He erred in a lot of people's opinion - Cary Wiggins, Louis Sirkin, Steve Youngleson, attorneys that are friends of mine that work with me. All of us met today, and beyond a shadow of a doubt, the judge - a very good judge, intelligent judge - he erred in that there is an affirmative defense, at least one affirmative defense, to the question that was brought forward, and in Georgia that's enough where the judge cannot rule on issues that have to do with the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution or the Georgia Constitution, and he did.
"But he said from the bench, 'It's not a padlock order; you simply have to comply and get a 2008 business license,' and we are complying," Cornetta concluded. "So we'll just apply for 2008 and appeal his decision at the same time. Small potato stuff."
Love Shack May Be Forced To Close
JOHNS CREEK, Ga. -- The Love Shack, the controversial adult business in Johns Creek, may be forced to close.
A Fulton County Superior Court judge has decided that the store cannot operate at its current location, because it does not have a 2007 business license, which is required by law.
The store would not be forced to close until the judge signs a written order, which could come as soon as Monday.
In March, Johns Creek officials denied Love Shack owner John Cornetta a business permit. Cornetta kept the store open despite the rejection.
City officials then sued Cornetta.
Cornetta has said he is obeying the law, and will apply for a 2008 business license.
Cornetta said Friday he will appeal the judge’s decision.
A Fulton County Superior Court judge has decided that the store cannot operate at its current location, because it does not have a 2007 business license, which is required by law.
The store would not be forced to close until the judge signs a written order, which could come as soon as Monday.
In March, Johns Creek officials denied Love Shack owner John Cornetta a business permit. Cornetta kept the store open despite the rejection.
City officials then sued Cornetta.
Cornetta has said he is obeying the law, and will apply for a 2008 business license.
Cornetta said Friday he will appeal the judge’s decision.
Judge Rules Against The Love Shack
(WSB Radio) The latest round in the fight between Johns Creek and the Love Shack goes to the city.
A Fulton County Superior Court judge has ruled that the adult store does not have a 2007 business license, as required by law, and must close if it does not comply with city code.
The closure will not go into effect until Judge Ural Glanville signs a written order. That could come as soon as Monday.
In March, Johns Creek denied a regular business application which was being sought by John Cornetta, owner of the Love Shack chain. Despite the rejection, Cornetta kept his Johns Creek store in operation.
City officials went to court, looking to shut the adult-themed store down unless Cornetta came into compliance with city ordinances.
Cornetta says he is complying with city code, and will apply for a business license for 2008.
Without that license, Judge Glanville says, Cornetta cannot continue to operate the Love Shack at its current location.
To obtain a regular business license, the contents of the store cannot exceed certain standards. If the inventory does, then Cornetta would need to apply for a sexually oriented business license. However, the store's location isn't zoned for that.
Cornetta says he's not concerned. He claims the inventory at the Johns Creek location falls below what would be deemed as sexually oriented.
Cornetta says he also plans on appealing Judge Glanville's ruling to the Georgia Supreme Court.
A Fulton County Superior Court judge has ruled that the adult store does not have a 2007 business license, as required by law, and must close if it does not comply with city code.
The closure will not go into effect until Judge Ural Glanville signs a written order. That could come as soon as Monday.
In March, Johns Creek denied a regular business application which was being sought by John Cornetta, owner of the Love Shack chain. Despite the rejection, Cornetta kept his Johns Creek store in operation.
City officials went to court, looking to shut the adult-themed store down unless Cornetta came into compliance with city ordinances.
Cornetta says he is complying with city code, and will apply for a business license for 2008.
Without that license, Judge Glanville says, Cornetta cannot continue to operate the Love Shack at its current location.
To obtain a regular business license, the contents of the store cannot exceed certain standards. If the inventory does, then Cornetta would need to apply for a sexually oriented business license. However, the store's location isn't zoned for that.
Cornetta says he's not concerned. He claims the inventory at the Johns Creek location falls below what would be deemed as sexually oriented.
Cornetta says he also plans on appealing Judge Glanville's ruling to the Georgia Supreme Court.
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Judge says Love Shack operating illegally
By DOUG NURSE
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 02/21/08
A Fulton County Superior Court judge on Thursday handed the city of Johns Creek a significant legal victory over the Love Shack, an adult-themed store.
In his ruling from the bench, Judge Ural Glanville said the Love Shack doesn't have a required 2007 business license and must close if it does not comply with city ordinances.
The closure order doesn't take effect until the judge signs a written order, which could come as soon as Monday.
"We're happy with the judge's order because it vindicates that this business is operating illegally since the city's inception [Dec. 1, 2006] and brings us one step closer to either it operates in compliance under our laws or it closes its doors," said Mayor Mike Bodker.
In March, the city denied a regular business application sought by the adult-video chain owner, John Cornetta, but the store has continued operating anyway. Johns Creek officials wanted a court order to shut the controversial store or make Cornetta comply with city ordinances.
Lawyers from both camps cautioned against drawing conclusions until the judge signs a written order, because the order could include important nuances.
Cornetta said he is in compliance with the city ordinance and will apply for a business license for the current year.
In his verbal order, Glanville said Cornetta cannot operate the Love Shack at its current location at Jones and State Bridge roads without a business license.
However, to obtain a regular business license, the store's inventory cannot exceed certain standards. If it does, Cornetta would have to apply for a sexually oriented business license, but the store's location isn't zoned for that.
Under city ordinances, a store is an adult business if it meets one of a number of criteria, including:
• 25 percent or more of its floor space is dedicated to adult products.
• 25 percent of the wholesale or retail value of the inventory is adult-oriented.
• 25 percent of the establishment's revenue is derived from sale of adult material.
• Patrons must be 18 years old or older.
Cornetta said the Love Shack's inventory is below those standards, and that it's store policy at that location to allow minors inside if they are accompanied by an adult or a guardian.
Cornetta's attorney, Cary Wiggins, said the judge's statements indicated the store could be closed for even minor infractions – such as grass that's too tall – which he said was too severe and too broadly worded. Plus, Wiggins said, Glanville didn't take the First Amendment into consideration.
Cornetta said he will appeal Glanville's order to the Georgia Supreme Court.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 02/21/08
A Fulton County Superior Court judge on Thursday handed the city of Johns Creek a significant legal victory over the Love Shack, an adult-themed store.
In his ruling from the bench, Judge Ural Glanville said the Love Shack doesn't have a required 2007 business license and must close if it does not comply with city ordinances.
The closure order doesn't take effect until the judge signs a written order, which could come as soon as Monday.
"We're happy with the judge's order because it vindicates that this business is operating illegally since the city's inception [Dec. 1, 2006] and brings us one step closer to either it operates in compliance under our laws or it closes its doors," said Mayor Mike Bodker.
In March, the city denied a regular business application sought by the adult-video chain owner, John Cornetta, but the store has continued operating anyway. Johns Creek officials wanted a court order to shut the controversial store or make Cornetta comply with city ordinances.
Lawyers from both camps cautioned against drawing conclusions until the judge signs a written order, because the order could include important nuances.
Cornetta said he is in compliance with the city ordinance and will apply for a business license for the current year.
In his verbal order, Glanville said Cornetta cannot operate the Love Shack at its current location at Jones and State Bridge roads without a business license.
However, to obtain a regular business license, the store's inventory cannot exceed certain standards. If it does, Cornetta would have to apply for a sexually oriented business license, but the store's location isn't zoned for that.
Under city ordinances, a store is an adult business if it meets one of a number of criteria, including:
• 25 percent or more of its floor space is dedicated to adult products.
• 25 percent of the wholesale or retail value of the inventory is adult-oriented.
• 25 percent of the establishment's revenue is derived from sale of adult material.
• Patrons must be 18 years old or older.
Cornetta said the Love Shack's inventory is below those standards, and that it's store policy at that location to allow minors inside if they are accompanied by an adult or a guardian.
Cornetta's attorney, Cary Wiggins, said the judge's statements indicated the store could be closed for even minor infractions – such as grass that's too tall – which he said was too severe and too broadly worded. Plus, Wiggins said, Glanville didn't take the First Amendment into consideration.
Cornetta said he will appeal Glanville's order to the Georgia Supreme Court.
Love Shack
It is time to stop the silly harrassment
February 21, 2008 | 04:30 PM
I want to know when John Creek is going to finally give up trying to harrass the Love Shack and leave people alone. It is a shame and an embarrassment that the city continues to try and keep people from patronizing a shop that people clearly want to shop at. Our tax dollars should not be going to advance the deranged views of a bunch of prude hypocrites. I saw the wife of one of the city officials who is fighting against the Love Shack inside the store recently, buying stuff just like everyone else. It's time to end this insanity folks.
Jane
February 21, 2008 | 04:30 PM
I want to know when John Creek is going to finally give up trying to harrass the Love Shack and leave people alone. It is a shame and an embarrassment that the city continues to try and keep people from patronizing a shop that people clearly want to shop at. Our tax dollars should not be going to advance the deranged views of a bunch of prude hypocrites. I saw the wife of one of the city officials who is fighting against the Love Shack inside the store recently, buying stuff just like everyone else. It's time to end this insanity folks.
Jane
Johns Creek Mayor Criticised After Radio Interview
Johns Creek Mayor Mike Bodker Discounts Efforts of Volunteer Firefighters and Says Johns Creek Residents Care About Other Topics More Than A Fire Department
In Radio Interview With The Regular Guys of Rock 100.5
In a radio interview with The Regular Guys of Atlanta’s Rock 100.5, Johns Creek Mayor Mike Bodker said a Fire Department is not a real one if it’s staffed with volunteers, ridiculed the Fulton County Government once again and said the Johns Creek residents don’t really care about having its own fire department.
The interview took place on Thursday, Feb. 14, 2008 as a radio debate between Mayor Bodker and The Regular Guys.
To listen to Mayor Bodker’s full interview with The Regular Guys visit www.LoveShackOnline.com/pressportal.html or www.RegularGuys.com.
Mayor Bodker insulted the nearly 800,000 volunteer firefighters in the United States when he said, “For many years you didn’t have a real fire department yourself.”
Mayor Bodker was referring to the city of Roswell because they used volunteers in the past. Volunteer firefighters account for nearly 73% of firefighters in the United States. Of the total estimated 1,064,150 firefighters across the country, 777,350 are volunteers.
In fact, the majority of fire departments in the United States are volunteers. Of the total 26,354 fire departments in the country, more than 23,000 of them are either mostly volunteer or all volunteer.
“Perhaps Mayor Bodker needs a history lesson as much as he needs assistance in governing Johns Creek,” said Love Shack owner John Cornetta. “I know his name is a relatively unknown one in the history of the United States, but some guy that helped draft the Declaration of Independence and invented bifocals also established the first volunteer fire department in 1736. His name is Benjamin Franklin.”
Later in the interview, when The Regular Guys said, “I don’t think you can call it (Johns Creek) a city if you don’t have your own fire department “, Mayor Bodker replied with “Why don’t we measure a couple of other things that people might actually care about.”
The questions must be asked of the citizens of Johns Creek, “Does your mayor really care about public safety? And do you care about having your own fire and police department?”
In an article written by Doug Nurse in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on May 14, 2007, Nurse said the average response time for firefighters citywide is about 6 minutes, but it can take 11 minutes for county emergency workers to reach some parts of Johns Creek.
That’s nearly three times what the National Fire Protection Association recommends.
“Mayor Bodker has wasted more than $150,000 of the Johns Creek residents’ tax dollars to try to shut down the Love Shack in Johns Creek,” said Love Shack owner John Cornetta. “Despite the city of Johns Creek being in operation for more than a year now, the city still does not have its own fire or police department. Now Mayor Bodker has the audacity to appear on Atlanta radio and tell thousands of Atlanta’s volunteer firefighters that they don’t count as real firefighters!
“This man continues to prove that he is unfit and incompetent to complete his duties as Mayor of Johns Creek. He is a Mayor with no prior government experience and he ran unopposed in his quest to become Mayor of Johns Creek. Unfortunately for the thousands of Johns Creek residents, which includes myself, he has three more years in office.”
Mayor Bodker also continued his personal vendetta against Fulton County Government when he said on air, “I could say positive things about the (Fulton County) School System, I’m not going to say such positive things about Fulton County Government.”
But in the same interview he said, “We have hired Fulton County (firefighters). We utilize the fine young men and women of Fulton County to deliver those services today.”
This is the same Fulton County whom Mayor Bodker continually puts down and recently said in a press release posted on the Johns Creek website “Once again, a majority of Fulton County commissioners chose to throw their citizens to the wolves and abdicate their responsibility to preserve the community’s quality of life by failing to deal with their past mistakes,” Mayor Bodker said. “We keep paying and paying tax dollars to Fulton County leaders with the expectation that they will protect our citizens and our quality of life.”
This press release can be found in its entirety at http://johnscreekga.gov/news/2007-12-05_billboards.html .
Which is it Mayor Bodker? Is Fulton County Government good enough for you to rely on to supply emergency fire and police efforts to the citizens of Johns Creek or is the Fulton County Government failing to protect the Johns Creek citizens and preserve its quality of life?
Meanwhile, the Cornetta Charitable Foundation, the non-profit charity started by Cornetta, still has more than $4,000 money earmarked for the city of Johns Creek to build a fire department. This money has still not been accepted by the city of Johns Creek.
The Cornetta Charitable Foundation has already donated almost $4,000 to two families that saw a loved one perish in a Johns Creek fire on May 28, 2007.
Friday, January 11, 2008
Citizen lawsuit against Johns Creek
Citizen lawsuit against Johns Creek
They are wasting HUGE $$$$
January 11, 2008 | 03:26 PM
I would like to see a citizen lawsuit against the council members and mayor of Johns Creek for wasting city money and time trying to shut down the Love Shack store. This is a stupid example of prudish government officials trying to violate the constitution and local laws to carry out their weird personal agenda. These people obviously have strange psychological hangups about sex, and they are spending huge amounts of taxpayer money trying to enforce their weird sexual problems on everyone else in the community. This should be stopped, and these unfortunate people should seek professional help for their sexual problems.
Rick Bristol
They are wasting HUGE $$$$
January 11, 2008 | 03:26 PM
I would like to see a citizen lawsuit against the council members and mayor of Johns Creek for wasting city money and time trying to shut down the Love Shack store. This is a stupid example of prudish government officials trying to violate the constitution and local laws to carry out their weird personal agenda. These people obviously have strange psychological hangups about sex, and they are spending huge amounts of taxpayer money trying to enforce their weird sexual problems on everyone else in the community. This should be stopped, and these unfortunate people should seek professional help for their sexual problems.
Rick Bristol
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
